benjamindemaille
People rank #243 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 15 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.
- AI-assisted commits, last 30 days1,347
- All time2,534since detection began
- Active days23 of 30busiest day: 213 commits
- Tools detected1
Cite this statistic
DevImprint recorded 1,347 detectable AI-assisted commits for benjamindemaille during 2026-08-15–2026-09-13 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Snapshot: 2026-09-13T03:27:04.226857+00:00. 49.6% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-13. Source: https://devimprint.com/developers/benjamindemaille/. Aggregate snapshot: https://devimprint.com/snapshots/da8f0f66a1eb4f0fa64db42f3b3762a405e05dca6f9f6286ae653e74b07055b7/
Daily activity
Table view
| Day (UTC) | AI-assisted commits |
|---|---|
| 15 August 2026 | 19 |
| 16 August 2026 | 0 |
| 17 August 2026 | 0 |
| 18 August 2026 | 120 |
| 19 August 2026 | 60 |
| 20 August 2026 | 83 |
| 21 August 2026 | 47 |
| 22 August 2026 | 23 |
| 23 August 2026 | 40 |
| 24 August 2026 | 0 |
| 25 August 2026 | 0 |
| 26 August 2026 | 31 |
| 27 August 2026 | 203 |
| 28 August 2026 | 213 |
| 29 August 2026 | 136 |
| 30 August 2026 | 8 |
| 31 August 2026 | 0 |
| 1 September 2026 | 28 |
| 2 September 2026 | 56 |
| 3 September 2026 | 37 |
| 4 September 2026 | 19 |
| 5 September 2026 | 10 |
| 6 September 2026 | 21 |
| 7 September 2026 | 59 |
| 8 September 2026 | 20 |
| 9 September 2026 | 69 |
| 10 September 2026 | 36 |
| 11 September 2026 | 9 |
| 12 September 2026 | 0 |
| 13 September 2026 | 0 |
Repositories containing these commits
| Repository | Last 30 days | All time |
|---|---|---|
| IPNP-BIPN/gatk-rs | 782 | 1,210 |
| IPNP-BIPN/picard-rs | 329 | 541 |
| IPNP-BIPN/bwa-mem4 | 161 | 599 |
| chrchang/plink-ng | 65 | 65 |
| scverse/rustar-aligner | 6 | 7 |
| pytorch/pytorch | 1 | 1 |
| rgcgithub/regenie | 1 | 1 |
| satijalab/seurat | 1 | 1 |
| scverse/scvi-tools | 1 | 1 |
| EricLBuehler/homebrew-core | 0 | 5 |
About this page
Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.