dj-pearson
People rank #39 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 15 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.
- AI-assisted commits, last 30 days2,620
- All time5,635since detection began
- Active days29 of 30busiest day: 372 commits
- Tools detected2
Cite this statistic
DevImprint recorded 2,620 detectable AI-assisted commits for dj-pearson during 2026-08-15–2026-09-13 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Snapshot: 2026-09-13T03:27:04.226857+00:00. 49.6% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-13. Source: https://devimprint.com/developers/dj-pearson/. Aggregate snapshot: https://devimprint.com/snapshots/da8f0f66a1eb4f0fa64db42f3b3762a405e05dca6f9f6286ae653e74b07055b7/
Daily activity
Table view
| Day (UTC) | AI-assisted commits |
|---|---|
| 15 August 2026 | 113 |
| 16 August 2026 | 112 |
| 17 August 2026 | 103 |
| 18 August 2026 | 55 |
| 19 August 2026 | 61 |
| 20 August 2026 | 85 |
| 21 August 2026 | 77 |
| 22 August 2026 | 265 |
| 23 August 2026 | 372 |
| 24 August 2026 | 109 |
| 25 August 2026 | 8 |
| 26 August 2026 | 22 |
| 27 August 2026 | 34 |
| 28 August 2026 | 174 |
| 29 August 2026 | 142 |
| 30 August 2026 | 160 |
| 31 August 2026 | 79 |
| 1 September 2026 | 13 |
| 2 September 2026 | 36 |
| 3 September 2026 | 8 |
| 4 September 2026 | 7 |
| 5 September 2026 | 99 |
| 6 September 2026 | 31 |
| 7 September 2026 | 45 |
| 8 September 2026 | 60 |
| 9 September 2026 | 101 |
| 10 September 2026 | 52 |
| 11 September 2026 | 193 |
| 12 September 2026 | 4 |
| 13 September 2026 | 0 |
Repositories containing these commits
| Repository | Last 30 days | All time |
|---|---|---|
| dj-pearson/GradeThread | 1,975 | 4,391 |
| dj-pearson/desmoines-ai-pulse | 645 | 949 |
| dj-pearson/Printyx | 0 | 239 |
| dj-pearson/project-profit-radar | 0 | 38 |
| dj-pearson/empty-stage-starter | 0 | 18 |
About this page
Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.