DevImprint.

Rankings → jcelerier

jcelerier

People rank #360 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 15 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.

49.6% of known repositories scanned · provisionalSnapshot How we measure →
Download JSON ↗Read as Markdown ↗Snapshot & coverage ↗
Cite this statistic

DevImprint recorded 1,122 detectable AI-assisted commits for jcelerier during 2026-08-15–2026-09-13 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Snapshot: 2026-09-13T03:27:04.226857+00:00. 49.6% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-13. Source: https://devimprint.com/developers/jcelerier/. Aggregate snapshot: https://devimprint.com/snapshots/da8f0f66a1eb4f0fa64db42f3b3762a405e05dca6f9f6286ae653e74b07055b7/

Snapshot & coverage

Daily activity

2026-08-15 to 2026-09-13
AI-assisted commits per day over the 30-day window beginning 15 August 2026. Days are UTC as recorded in the commit. The final day may be incomplete at the snapshot timestamp.
Table view
Day (UTC)AI-assisted commits
15 August 202624
16 August 202641
17 August 202618
18 August 202617
19 August 2026234
20 August 202629
21 August 202612
22 August 202666
23 August 202670
24 August 202616
25 August 2026115
26 August 20260
27 August 20260
28 August 20261
29 August 20260
30 August 20261
31 August 20264
1 September 202688
2 September 202629
3 September 202620
4 September 202675
5 September 202614
6 September 202624
7 September 2026178
8 September 202644
9 September 20261
10 September 20261
11 September 20260
12 September 20260
13 September 20260

Repositories containing these commits

These are repositories where matching commits were found. They are not necessarily owned by this account or listed on its GitHub profile.

RepositoryLast 30 daysAll time
ossia/score9801,623
ossia/libossia51150
ossia/score-addon-orbbec2828
celtera/uvfs2031
celtera/avendish19429
ossia/score-user-library1616
ossia/sdk494
celtera/libremidi217
ossia/score-addon-onnx131
celtera/jk12

About this page

Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.

Snapshot da8f0f66a1eb · 222,270 identities ranked.