michelkerkmeester-barter
People rank #119 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 15 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.
- AI-assisted commits, last 30 days1,813
- All time1,953since detection began
- Active days19 of 30busiest day: 284 commits
- Tools detected2
Cite this statistic
DevImprint recorded 1,813 detectable AI-assisted commits for michelkerkmeester-barter during 2026-08-15–2026-09-13 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Snapshot: 2026-09-13T03:27:04.226857+00:00. 49.6% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-13. Source: https://devimprint.com/developers/michelkerkmeester-barter/. Aggregate snapshot: https://devimprint.com/snapshots/da8f0f66a1eb4f0fa64db42f3b3762a405e05dca6f9f6286ae653e74b07055b7/
Daily activity
Table view
| Day (UTC) | AI-assisted commits |
|---|---|
| 15 August 2026 | 90 |
| 16 August 2026 | 284 |
| 17 August 2026 | 180 |
| 18 August 2026 | 138 |
| 19 August 2026 | 86 |
| 20 August 2026 | 128 |
| 21 August 2026 | 72 |
| 22 August 2026 | 88 |
| 23 August 2026 | 44 |
| 24 August 2026 | 48 |
| 25 August 2026 | 34 |
| 26 August 2026 | 86 |
| 27 August 2026 | 70 |
| 28 August 2026 | 118 |
| 29 August 2026 | 172 |
| 30 August 2026 | 110 |
| 31 August 2026 | 40 |
| 1 September 2026 | 17 |
| 2 September 2026 | 8 |
| 3 September 2026 | 0 |
| 4 September 2026 | 0 |
| 5 September 2026 | 0 |
| 6 September 2026 | 0 |
| 7 September 2026 | 0 |
| 8 September 2026 | 0 |
| 9 September 2026 | 0 |
| 10 September 2026 | 0 |
| 11 September 2026 | 0 |
| 12 September 2026 | 0 |
| 13 September 2026 | 0 |
Repositories containing these commits
| Repository | Last 30 days | All time |
|---|---|---|
| MichelKerkmeester/skilled-harness__spec-driven-agent-loops | 914 | 984 |
| MichelKerkmeester/opencode--skilled-agent-loops-with-spec-kit-memory | 899 | 969 |
About this page
Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.