sivert-io
People rank #139 by AI-assisted commits detected in public repositories over the 30 days from 15 August 2026. Profile on GitHub.
- AI-assisted commits, last 30 days1,698
- All time2,315since detection began
- Active days25 of 30busiest day: 253 commits
- Tools detected3
Cite this statistic
DevImprint recorded 1,698 detectable AI-assisted commits for sivert-io during 2026-08-15–2026-09-13 (UTC). Population: resolved person; rank within people. Snapshot: 2026-09-13T03:27:04.226857+00:00. 49.6% of known repositories scanned; provisional. Methodology: 2026-09-13. Source: https://devimprint.com/developers/sivert-io/. Aggregate snapshot: https://devimprint.com/snapshots/da8f0f66a1eb4f0fa64db42f3b3762a405e05dca6f9f6286ae653e74b07055b7/
Daily activity
Table view
| Day (UTC) | AI-assisted commits |
|---|---|
| 15 August 2026 | 0 |
| 16 August 2026 | 0 |
| 17 August 2026 | 55 |
| 18 August 2026 | 56 |
| 19 August 2026 | 18 |
| 20 August 2026 | 4 |
| 21 August 2026 | 102 |
| 22 August 2026 | 95 |
| 23 August 2026 | 18 |
| 24 August 2026 | 13 |
| 25 August 2026 | 43 |
| 26 August 2026 | 38 |
| 27 August 2026 | 31 |
| 28 August 2026 | 31 |
| 29 August 2026 | 200 |
| 30 August 2026 | 44 |
| 31 August 2026 | 46 |
| 1 September 2026 | 22 |
| 2 September 2026 | 85 |
| 3 September 2026 | 79 |
| 4 September 2026 | 74 |
| 5 September 2026 | 17 |
| 6 September 2026 | 101 |
| 7 September 2026 | 146 |
| 8 September 2026 | 253 |
| 9 September 2026 | 109 |
| 10 September 2026 | 18 |
| 11 September 2026 | 0 |
| 12 September 2026 | 0 |
| 13 September 2026 | 0 |
Repositories containing these commits
| Repository | Last 30 days | All time |
|---|---|---|
| Gryt-chat/client | 798 | 1,134 |
| Gryt-chat/gryt | 332 | 444 |
| Gryt-chat/site | 191 | 258 |
| Gryt-chat/server | 132 | 184 |
| Gryt-chat/docs | 101 | 150 |
| sivert-io/matchzy-auto-tournament | 76 | 77 |
| Gryt-chat/reports | 48 | 48 |
| Gryt-chat/crypto | 20 | 20 |
About this page
Counts come from commits published in public repositories that carry a detectable AI coding tool signature. They are not a measure of productivity, effort, or code quality. False positives and missed activity are possible; absence does not establish absence of AI use. Read the methodology, orask to be removed.